From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hechtenthal v. Eisenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

January, 1931.


Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. All concur, except Hinman, J., who dissents and votes for reversal, and remittal, on the ground that there is no competent proof that the dermatitis was due to the cut on the finger.


Summaries of

Matter of Hechtenthal v. Eisenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Matter of Hechtenthal v. Eisenberg

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOSEPH HECHTENTHAL, Respondent, v. EISENBERG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1931

Citations

232 App. Div. 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)