From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Heartland Indus. v. Cty. of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 1985
112 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 29, 1985


Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs.

There was substantial evidence adduced at the administrative hearing to support respondent's determination ( see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176).

Moreover, the penalty imposed upon petitioners was not so disproportionate to the offenses, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness ( Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233). The courts will generally defer to the judgment of an administrative agency with respect to the fashioning of regulatory penalties ( Matter of Ahsaf v. Nyquist, 37 N.Y.2d 182). Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Heartland Indus. v. Cty. of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 1985
112 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Heartland Indus. v. Cty. of Suffolk

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HEARTLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK et al., Petitioners, v. COUNTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 29, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Ram v. Board of Health

Inasmuch as the petition raises a substantial evidence question, the Supreme Court erred in not transferring…

Ram v. Board of Health of the Nassau County Health District

Inasmuch as the petition raises a substantial evidence question, the Supreme Court erred in not transferring…