From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Haz-O-Waste Corp. v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1984
103 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

July 13, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Miller, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Boomer, Green and O'Donnell, JJ.


Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: There is substantial evidence to support respondent's determination that petitioner illegally stored cyanide wastes (see Matter of 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176; ECL 27-0305, subd 1; 6 NYCRR 360.2). Although petitioner was specifically directed on April 20, 1979 not to "accept, store, transport or dispose of any wastes significantly contaminated with cyanides or cyanide compounds", inspections of petitioner's facility on June 4, 1981 and September 23, 1981 revealed that petitioner was storing cyanide wastes. Indeed, during each inspection petitioner's president pointed out a number of barrels of cyanide on the premises. The $10,000 civil penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock one's sense of fairness ( Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233). We note that petitioner's claim of a denial of due process was not raised in its pleadings or at the administrative hearing and therefore, is not properly before us for review (see Matter of Town of Candor v. Flacke, 82 A.D.2d 951, 952). We have considered the remaining points raised by petitioner and preserved for review and have found each of them lacking in merit.


Summaries of

Matter of Haz-O-Waste Corp. v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1984
103 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Haz-O-Waste Corp. v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HAZ-O-WASTE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. HENRY G…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 13, 1984

Citations

103 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Taughrin v. Rodriguez

Ford Credit contends that, by imposing vicarious liability upon a person who has no means of monitoring or…

Matter of Scott v. Dept. of Environmental

Memorandum: The record contains substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioners twice…