From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Harvey v. Marsaw Marsaw, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 7, 1977
58 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

July 7, 1977


Appeal from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board, filed June 25, 1976, which affirmed an award for a schedule loss of 100% of the left eye. While working as a mechanic, claimant sustained a compensable injury which required surgical removal of the lens of the left eye. He was subsequently fitted with contact lenses, which he contends he is unable to wear in his present job as a welder because of the irritation caused by grinding steel and by smoke. Claimant also testified that his eye gets sore after wearing the contact lenses for only a couple of hours, and that he has tried for a year to build up a tolerance to these lenses. There is medical evidence justifying claimant's contention of his inability to use contact lenses in the polluted environment created by his work. Concededly, the 100% loss of binocular vision sustained by the claimant is correctable by the use of the contact lenses. In affirming the award to the claimant the board found that he could not tolerate contact lenses in order to do his job as a welder, and that he should not be required to change jobs. Within the context of the facts established in the present case, this court had previously upheld similar awards for 100% loss of vision (Matter of Clippard v Costello Concrete Co., 36 A.D.2d 786, affd 30 N.Y.2d 628; Matter of Franzese v Jellgren Constr. Co., 29 A.D.2d 1037, mot for lv to app den 22 N.Y.2d 644). We conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the board's determination in this case. We find no merit to appellants' additional argument that claimant failed to establish any loss of earnings as a result of his inability to tolerate the contact lenses while working. Since this was a schedule award made pursuant to section 15 (subd 3, par p) of the Workmen's Compensation Law, there is no requirement of proof of a present loss of earnings (Matter of Smith v Rome Cable Corp., 27 A.D.2d 972). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board. Koreman, P.J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Mahoney, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Harvey v. Marsaw Marsaw, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 7, 1977
58 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Matter of Harvey v. Marsaw Marsaw, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of DAVID HARVEY, Respondent, v. MARSAW MARSAW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1977

Citations

58 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Matter of Salvi v. Vanguard Plumbing, Heating

He previously reported, however, that revision of the lens was necessary "to improve the tolerance of the…