From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Harvey v. Allegany Timber Land

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 14, 1990
162 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

June 14, 1990

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Board.


Claimant, a logger, was severely injured when a tree fell upon him while he was cutting wood for Allegany Timber Land Company, Inc. (hereinafter Allegany). The sole issue on this appeal is whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the decision of the Workers' Compensation Board that claimant was, at the time of his injury, an employee of Allegany and not an independent contractor.

The record demonstrates that while at work for Allegany, claimant was supplied with a bulldozer where necessary, was directed what type and size of tree to cut and was subject to being discharged by Allegany upon their determination that his work was unsatisfactory. There was other evidence in the record which would support a finding that claimant was an independent contractor. However, the resolution of such a factual issue is within the exclusive fact-finding function of the Board (see, Matter of Agnello v. Ippolito, 132 A.D.2d 733; Matter of Hopkins v Players' Three, 99 A.D.2d 912) and, where, as here, there is substantial evidence to support its decision, it must be affirmed.

Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers' Compensation Board. Kane, J.P., Weiss, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Harvey v. Allegany Timber Land

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 14, 1990
162 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Harvey v. Allegany Timber Land

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of PHILIP HARVEY, Respondent, v. ALLEGANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1990

Citations

162 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
557 N.Y.S.2d 687

Citing Cases

Matter of Scott v. Manzi Taxi Transp. Co.

In our view, the testimony of claimant and Manzi provided substantial evidence to support the Board's…

Matter of Kurzyna v. Communicar, Inc.

Communicar contends that its relationship with drivers is that of a contractor with an independent…