From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harren v. Middle Island Central School District No. 12

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1975
49 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

October 6, 1975


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent's determination that petitioner be retired because she had attained the mandatory retirement age, petitioner appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered October 9, 1974, as denied the application and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. On the record in this appeal, there is no evidence of unconstitutional discrimination. A mandatory retirement policy at age 70 is not unconstitutional under present standards, and this record does not reveal anything other than a statutorily authorized mandatory retirement policy. Rabin, Acting P.J., Hopkins, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harren v. Middle Island Central School District No. 12

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1975
49 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Harren v. Middle Island Central School District No. 12

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALICE HARREN, Appellant, v. MIDDLE ISLAND CENTRAL SCHOOL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1975

Citations

49 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Palmer v. Ticcione

A mandatory retirement policy at age 70 is not unconstitutional under present standards, and this record does…

DeShon v. Bettendorf Community Sch. Dist

Other courts in evaluating equal protection challenges to the mandatory retirement policies of school…