From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Harp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 19, 1992
181 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 19, 1992


Our examination of respondent's application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this court's rules ( 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]) regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent's reinstatement. Accordingly, respondent will be reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Weiss, P.J., Mikoll, Levine, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent be and hereby is reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

In re Harp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 19, 1992
181 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

In re Harp

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WENDELL D. HARP, an Attorney, Respondent. COMMITTEE ON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 19, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)