From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Harlow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 15, 2001
280 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Summary

disbarring an attorney after he was convicted of enticing an actual child over the internet

Summary of this case from State v. Robins

Opinion

February 15, 2001.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Scott Bush, Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1999. He resides in Connecticut.

On May 9, 2000, respondent was convicted in Connecticut of the felony of injury or risk of injury to, or impairing the morals of, children. According to the plea transcript, respondent engaged in sexual contact with a 13-year-old girl after corresponding with her over the internet and arranging a meeting. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison but the sentence was suspended and 10 years of probation was imposed upon various conditions. In view of respondent's conviction of a serious crime (see, Judiciary Law § 90 [d]), this Court suspended him from practice until such time as a final disciplinary order was made (see, 274 A.D.2d 737). Our suspension decision required petitioner to move for final discipline after respondent was disciplined as an attorney in Connecticut. Petitioner now advises that respondent has been suspended for a period of 10 years in Connecticut, commencing from the date of his conviction. Petitioner moves for imposition of final discipline pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g).

Under the circumstances presented, we conclude that respondent should be disbarred.

ORDERED that respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; he is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules (see, 22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys.


Summaries of

Matter of Harlow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 15, 2001
280 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

disbarring an attorney after he was convicted of enticing an actual child over the internet

Summary of this case from State v. Robins

In Matter of Harlow (280 AD2d 870), the Third Department disbarred an attorney who had engaged in sexual conversations with a minor over the Internet, and then, after arranging a meeting with the minor, had actual sexual contact with her. The attorney was convicted in Connecticut of a felony, and given a 10-year suspended sentence.

Summary of this case from Matter of Lever
Case details for

Matter of Harlow

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOHN A. HARLOW III, AN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR-AT-LAW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 15, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 645

Citing Cases

Matter of Lever

The distinction is significant. In Matter of Harlow ( 280 AD2d 870), the Third Department disbarred an…

State v. Robins

ttempting to entice a minor to engage in criminal sexual acts when the "minor" was an adult undercover…