From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hanover v. N.Y. St. Policemen's Firemen's

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 26, 1978
383 N.E.2d 557 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Argued September 19, 1978

Decided October 26, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, JOHN H. PENNOCK, J.

Nicholas J. Sargent for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Winifred C. Stanley and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The Comptroller properly determined that the application for an ordinary disability retirement filed on August 14, 1975 by the appellant's intestate, a member of the New York State Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement System, was canceled upon his death on October 6, 1975.

As appellant concedes, the retirement did not vest at the time of filing. Section 362 (subd aa, par 2) of the Retirement and Social Security Law expressly states that retirement shall not be effective until "as of a date approved by the [State] comptroller". At the time of decedent's demise, the Comptroller and his administrative aides had neither completed the investigation he was required to make for the purpose of passing on the merits of the application, nor fixed an effective date for retirement (cf. Matter of Cohen v Levitt, 36 A.D.2d 992). Moreover, on the basis of the record here, it cannot be said that it was error as a matter of law for the Appellate Division to find that, under the circumstances of this case, the passage of time between the filing and the death did not constitute undue delay.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Hanover v. N.Y. St. Policemen's Firemen's

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 26, 1978
383 N.E.2d 557 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

Matter of Hanover v. N.Y. St. Policemen's Firemen's

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JANET HANOVER, as Administratrix of the Estate of WILLIAM…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 26, 1978

Citations

383 N.E.2d 557 (N.Y. 1978)
383 N.E.2d 557
411 N.Y.S.2d 5

Citing Cases

Matter of Kuzma v. City of Binghamton

Adoption of this date would, of course, mean that the change in retirement plans and mandatory retirement age…

Matter of Graham v. McCall

As for decedent's application for ordinary disability retirement benefits, while it is indeed true that such…