From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hannon v. Cuomo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 18, 1980
417 N.E.2d 1005 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued November 19, 1980

Decided December 18, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department.

James B. Denman for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Diane De Furio Foody and Shirley Adelson Siegel of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

On this record, there was substantial evidence to support the respondent's conclusion. Nor can be it said that the penalty is shocking "to one's sense of fairness" (Matter of Butterly Green v Lomenzo, 36 N.Y.2d 250, 256; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 223). It also appears that the notice and complaint served upon the appellant comported with the requirements of due process.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur; Judge GABRIELLI taking no part.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Hannon v. Cuomo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 18, 1980
417 N.E.2d 1005 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Matter of Hannon v. Cuomo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN P. HANNON, Appellant, v. MARIO CUOMO, as Secretary…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 18, 1980

Citations

417 N.E.2d 1005 (N.Y. 1980)
417 N.E.2d 1005
436 N.Y.S.2d 617

Citing Cases

Matter of Yonkers Nissan, Inc. v. Adduci

Adjudged that the petition is granted to the extent that the determination is modified, on the law, by…

Matter of Rustine v. Patterson

pal under section 441-c Real Prop. of the Real Property Law (Kostika v Cuomo, 41 N.Y.2d 673, 676; Matter of…