From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hammerl v. Maevis

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1974
34 N.Y.2d 579 (N.Y. 1974)

Opinion

Argued February 13, 1974

Decided March 20, 1974

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MANUEL A. GOMEZ, J.

Norman Redlich, Corporation Counsel ( Jesse J. Fine and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for appellant.

Julius W. Cohn for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs to petitioner-respondent, on the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, WACHTLER and STEVENS. Judges JONES and RABIN dissent and vote to reverse and reinstate the determination of the Commissioner on the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice LOUIS J. CAPOZZOLI at the Appellate Division.


Summaries of

Matter of Hammerl v. Maevis

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1974
34 N.Y.2d 579 (N.Y. 1974)
Case details for

Matter of Hammerl v. Maevis

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH F. HAMMERL, Respondent, v. ALFRED C. MAEVIS, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 20, 1974

Citations

34 N.Y.2d 579 (N.Y. 1974)
354 N.Y.S.2d 946
310 N.E.2d 542

Citing Cases

Thera Realty, LLC v. Envtl. Control Bd.

Respondents' assertion that this matter is improperly before this court, is misplaced as "the proper vehicle…

Sierra v. McGuire

We may, however, in such cases, consider the matter, de novo, as though it had been transferred. (See Matter…