From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hairston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 19, 1998
247 A.D.2d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 19, 1998

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant was a secretary for the employer at its Albany location until she resigned in June 1996 to relocate to the City of Buffalo, Erie County, to be with her husband who had been living and working there since their marriage in August 1995. Although claimant attempted to find a job in Buffalo, her efforts proved unsuccessful. Nevertheless, she chose to relocate to be closer to her husband, leaving her position in Albany even though continuing work was available to her. Under these circumstances, we find substantial evidence to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's ruling that claimant quit her job for personal and noncompelling reasons, thereby rendering her disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits ( see generally, Matter of Petruzzi [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 754; Matter of Howe [Hudacs], 188 A.D.2d 982).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Hairston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 19, 1998
247 A.D.2d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Hairston

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of YVONNE M. HAIRSTON, Appellant. JOHN E…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 19, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 396

Citing Cases

Matter of the Claim of Dybowski

We affirm. Claimant testified that she knew when she was engaged that her husband would be leaving the area…

In re the Claim of Reda

We affirm. Although claimant's husband hoped to establish a consulting business using former business…