From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gurwitch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1998
256 A.D.2d 180 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 17, 1998

Appeal from the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Megan Tallmer, J.).


The sanction was properly imposed after appellant was given a reasonable opportunity to explain why he did not telephone the court or arrange for another attorney to advise the court of his lateness ( see, Matter of Marcus v. Bamberger, 180 A.D.2d 533; cf., Matter of Walsh v. People, 206 A.D.2d 434). There is no indication that appellant could have offered any justification for this failure at a formal hearing.

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Wallach, Rubin and Williams, JJ. [ See, 174 Misc.2d 948.]


Summaries of

Matter of Gurwitch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1998
256 A.D.2d 180 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Gurwitch

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LAWRENCE GURWITCH et al., Appellants. THE PEOPLE OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 180 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 534

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Sanchez

ORDERED that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs. The Supreme Court properly directed the appellant…

People v. Dean

r, i.e., his actual engagement in another matter, and there was no evidence that he had failed to appear at…