From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Grossman v. Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1998
248 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 9, 1998

Appeal from the Family Court, Queens County (Friedman, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts, by deleting the provisions thereof which denied the father's objections to those portions of the Hearing Examiner's order which directed him to pay $366 per week for the child's support, including $106 per week for the child's medical expenses and $38 per week for the mother's credit card debt, and awarded the mother $6,102 in arrears, and substituting therefor provisions directing the father to pay $222 per week for child support and $2,934 in arrears; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the order dated February 28, 1996, is modified accordingly.

Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court properly held that he was "not forthright in the presentation of his finances [before the Hearing Examiner] and that the [Hearing Examiner] had insufficient information to enter an order under the CSSA guidelines". Under these circumstances, the Child Support Standards Act provides that when there is "insufficient evidence to determine gross income, the court shall order child support based upon the needs or standard of living of the child, whichever is greater" (Family Ct. Act § 413 [k]; Orlando v. Orlando, 222 A.D.2d 906). The record indicates that this is an appropriate case in which to apply this provision ( see, Orlando v. Orlando, supra).

However, the record shows that the Hearing Examiner erred in including $106 per week for medical expenses and $38 per week in credit card debt, for a total of $144 per week, in calculating the father's child support obligation of $366 per week. These awards were duplicative in that the father was also required to pay 50% of all unreimbursed medical expenses, and the credit card debt was attributable to past living expenses which were included in the award of arrears. Consequently, the father's weekly child support award must be reduced from $366 to $222. Since the award of arrears was calculated based upon the $366 figure, the award of arrears has been adjusted to $2,934.

The father's remaining contentions are without merit.

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Miller and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Grossman v. Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1998
248 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Grossman v. Grossman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EILEEN GROSSMAN, Respondent, v. DENNIS GROSSMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 206

Citing Cases

Weiss v. Rosenthal

ORDERED that the order entered October 30, 2013, is affirmed, with one bill of costs. Although the father…

Tsarova v. Tsarov

"Great deference should be given to the determination of the Support Magistrate, who is in the best position…