From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1937
250 App. Div. 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

April 9, 1937.

Appeal from Surrogate's Court of New York County.

H.H. Nordlinger of counsel [ David B. Lefkowitz with him on the brief; Nordlinger, Riegelman Cooper, attorneys], for the appellant Walter A. Fribourg.

Harold R. Medina of counsel [ John W. Jordan with him on the brief], for the appellant Edythe Fribourg.

Samuel Robert Weltz, for the petitioners, respondents.

Present — MARTIN, P.J., O'MALLEY, UNTERMYER, DORE and COHN, JJ.


Although we find no act of dishonesty on the part of the appellant executors nor that any loss has resulted from their administration of the estate from the acts complained of, yet upon the conceded violation in two series of transactions of subdivision 7 of section 104 of the Surrogate's Court Act, it cannot be said that the action of the surrogate in removing them constituted an improper exercise of discretion. It follows that the decree, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs.


Decree, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1937
250 App. Div. 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Matter of Grossman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application to Revoke Letters Testamentary Issued to…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1937

Citations

250 App. Div. 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
294 N.Y.S. 942

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Errion

" In re Grossman's Estate, 283 N.Y.S. 323, 328; affirmed,294 N YS. 942: "It has been further shown that the…

Matter of Duke

We begin our analysis with SCPA 719, which provides that a Surrogate "may" suspend, modify, or revoke letters…