From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gridley Bldg. v. Gingold

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 12, 1962
183 N.E.2d 909 (N.Y. 1962)

Opinion

Argued May 7, 1962

Decided June 12, 1962

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, J. ROBERT LYNCH, J.

John Timothy Smith for appellant.

Stewart F. Hancock, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( George T. Driscoll and Eleanor Theodore of counsel), for respondent.


The order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs. Subdivision 1 of section 716 of the Real Property Tax Law authorizes but one demand as of right for an admission of the percentage of full value at which real property is assessed on the tax rolls of the municipality, which is all that has been determined by the order under review. The taxpayer could not serve a subsequent demand without prior application addressed to the discretion of Special Term for leave to do so, as in the case of a motion for permission to serve an amended or supplemental pleading after the time to serve it as of right has expired ( Austin v. Saccacio, 1 A.D.2d 1028; Orlik v. National Carbon Co., 176 App. Div. 600). The order appealed from does not preclude the taxpayer from making such an application at Special Term on good cause shown.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Gridley Bldg. v. Gingold

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 12, 1962
183 N.E.2d 909 (N.Y. 1962)
Case details for

Matter of Gridley Bldg. v. Gingold

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GRIDLEY BLDG., INC., Appellant, v. BENJAMIN M. GINGOLD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 12, 1962

Citations

183 N.E.2d 909 (N.Y. 1962)
183 N.E.2d 909
230 N.Y.S.2d 27

Citing Cases

South Slope Holding Corp. v. Board of Assessment Review of Town of Jerusalem

Subdivision (1) of RPTL 716 provides that "the petitioner may serve upon the respondent a demand for…

Matter of Levin Prop. v. Assessor of Village

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable jointly by the appellants. Under the…