From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Grenfell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1945
294 N.Y. 610 (N.Y. 1945)

Opinion

Argued October 22, 1945

Decided October 24, 1945

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, IMRIE, J.

McDonald King for appellant.

Richmond D. Moot for respondent.

Arlen T. St. Louis, Corporation Counsel, for City Clerk of City of Schenectady.



We agree with the Appellate Division that if the provisions of the Second Class Cities Law were to be adopted as a city charter, such provisions were required by the statute to be designated specifically in the proposed local law. We pass upon no other question.

The order should be affirmed.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and MEDALIE, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Grenfell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1945
294 N.Y. 610 (N.Y. 1945)
Case details for

Matter of Grenfell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of K. PASCOE GRENFELL, Respondent. GERTRUDE LAWYER, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1945

Citations

294 N.Y. 610 (N.Y. 1945)
63 N.E.2d 593

Citing Cases

Visser v. Magnarelli

Though now more or less obsolete, the Second Class Cities Law still functions for certain purposes, such as…

Matter of Yaras

Subdivision 5 of section 2 of the City Home Rule Law, as added by chapter 602 of the Laws of 1944,…