From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Greco v. Department of Personnel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 2, 1996
226 A.D.2d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 2, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.).


Given the fact that petitioner was prevented from taking the 1988 Sergeant's examination by, what was subsequently determined to be, respondents' wrongful termination of his employment ( see, Matter of Department of Personnel v. New York Civ. Serv. Commn., 180 A.D.2d 449, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 755), his passing grade on the next-scheduled Sergeant's examination in 1993 should have been accepted as a makeup for the earlier examination.

However, notwithstanding such wrongful discharge, the IAS Court properly upheld respondents' determination that petitioner was not entitled, based on his subsequent passing of the next-scheduled Sergeant's examination in 1993, to retroactive promotion to Sergeant with full retroactive benefits for that title. The appropriate remedy for defects in the Civil Service appointment or promotion process is not retroactive appointment or promotion with an award of back pay, which would violate the strong State policy of discretionary governmental appointive power underlying Civil Service Law § 61, but rather reconsideration for appointment or promotion after the defect in the process has been corrected ( Matter of Andriola v. Ortiz, 82 N.Y.2d 320, 324-326, cert denied sub nom. Andriola v. Antinoro, 511 U.S. 1031; see also, Carro v. City of New York, 214 A.D.2d 450; Christensen v. Levitt, 207 A.D.2d 320; Matter of Archer v Riccio, 201 A.D.2d 395).

Petitioner's attempt to distinguish his circumstances from those in Andriola is unavailing inasmuch as that case and its progeny draw no distinction between affirmative or intentional conduct by respondents, on the one hand, and passive or negligent conduct by respondents, on the other, and, in any event, retroactive relief granted on the basis of either would equally violate the "one-in-three rule" of Civil Service Law § 61 ( cf., Matter of Beame v. DeLeon, 87 N.Y.2d 289; see generally, Davis, New York Court of Appeals Roundup, Remedies for Discrimination; The Role of Dissent, NYLJ, Jan. 16, 1996, at 3, col 1).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Greco v. Department of Personnel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 2, 1996
226 A.D.2d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Greco v. Department of Personnel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARC A. GRECO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 2, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
640 N.Y.S.2d 509

Citing Cases

City of New York v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Although Ricks was entitled to be considered for appointment, he was not guaranteed appointment had his name…

Matter of Scotto v. Giuliani

irective to award retroactive credit is hardly so clear and unequivocal as to warrant holding respondents in…