From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Granger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1992
185 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 30, 1992

James C. MacTarnghan, Depew, for petitioner.

Gerard M. LaRusso, Buffalo, for Office of Grievance Committees.


Petitioner was admitted to practice by this Court on February 16, 1982. On December 21, 1990 he was convicted by the Supreme Court, Erie County, following a jury trial, of conspiracy in the second degree and, solely by reason of the conviction, this Court entered an order of disbarment pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (Matter of Granger, 170 A.D.2d 1042). On November 18, 1992, this Court reversed petitioner's conviction and dismissed the indictment against him.

Petitioner now moves for an order vacating the order of disbarment. The Office of Grievance Committees has filed an answering affidavit indicating that further investigation regarding the matters that were the subject of the dismissed indictment is not warranted. Additionally, we have not received any complaint of misconduct against petitioner during the period of his disbarment.

Under the circumstances, petitioner is entitled to readmission to practice (see, Matter of Barash, 20 N.Y.2d 154; Matter of Chesler, 70 A.D.2d 141; Matter of Docherty, 42 A.D.2d 117).

BOOMER, J.P., PINE, BALIO, LAWTON and BOEHM, JJ., concur.

Order of disbarment vacated and petitioner reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law.


Summaries of

Matter of Granger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1992
185 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Granger

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PATRICK E. GRANGER, a Disbarred Attorney, Petitioner

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1992

Citations

185 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
592 N.Y.S.2d 1022