Opinion
Argued February 11, 1903
Decided March 3, 1903
Robert C. Titus and Carlton E. Ladd for appellant.
Devoe P. Hodson for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the findings of fact by the surrogate having been affirmed unanimously by the Appellate Division, we are prevented from examining the questions argued; no opinion.
Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN and WERNER, JJ. Dissenting: O'BRIEN, J.