From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Graf v. Silver Creek Preserving Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 27, 1939
257 App. Div. 1090 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

September 27, 1939.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ.


The employer operates a canning factory. The claimant, a boy of seventeen years of age, was employed by the employer without it having on file at the time either a standard employment certificate, a special employment certificate or a vacation work permit, as required by section 131 Lab. of the Labor Law. It is conceded that the claimant sustained an injury to his right hand and the percentage of loss was fixed at sixty-six and two-thirds per cent. The question involved here is whether under the stated facts and circumstances failure to meet the requirements of section 131 Lab. of the Labor Law made it mandatory for the referee to make an award under section 14-a Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law against the employer. The evidence and the appellants' concessions establish that the claimant was employed in violation of the Labor Law and the findings of the State Industrial Board were proper. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Claim of Graf v. Silver Creek Preserving Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 27, 1939
257 App. Div. 1090 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Claim of Graf v. Silver Creek Preserving Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of BRANDON GRAF, Respondent, against SILVER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1939

Citations

257 App. Div. 1090 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Willis v. Storey

" Petitioner cites several New York and Pennsylvania cases which support the proposition that "certificate"…