From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gould v. Kerwick

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 11, 1982
443 N.E.2d 948 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided November 11, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, AARON E. KLEIN, J.

Stephen L. Oppenheim for appellants.

G. Gordon Coughlin, Jr., for respondents.



On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and the judgment and order of Supreme Court, Ulster County, reinstated for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice HOWARD A. LEVINE at the Appellate Division ( 87 A.D.2d 917, 919-920). Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Matter of Gould v. Kerwick

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 11, 1982
443 N.E.2d 948 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Gould v. Kerwick

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KINGDON GOULD, JR., et al., Respondents, v. ROBERT A…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 11, 1982

Citations

443 N.E.2d 948 (N.Y. 1982)
443 N.E.2d 948
457 N.Y.S.2d 474

Citing Cases

Gordon v. Esopus

Respondents first argue that Supreme Court erred when it ruled, as a matter of law, that petitioners'…