From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Goodstein v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 18, 1993
196 A.D.2d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

August 18, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the proceeding is dismissed, and the Westchester County Board of Elections is directed to place the name of Phyllis G. Ross on the appropriate ballot.

The issue on this appeal is whether the Election Law requires the disqualification of signatures on a designating petition when the subscribing witness fails to include in his "Statement of Witness" the town or city in which the subscribing witness resides. We find that the failure of the subscribing witness to include the town or city in the "Statement of Witness" is no longer a fatal defect which renders the petition invalid (see, Matter of Barrett v Brodsky, 196 A.D.2d 603 [decided herewith]). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Lawrence and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Goodstein v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 18, 1993
196 A.D.2d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Goodstein v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT D. GOODSTEIN, Respondent, v. PHYLLIS G. ROSS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 18, 1993

Citations

196 A.D.2d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 398

Citing Cases

Matter of O'Dwyer v. Urbanski

Although the petitioners concede that the invalidation of these 78 signatures renders the number of valid…

In re Scaturro v. Maloney

The Supreme Court shall thereafter make a new determination on these is-sues in resolving this proceeding. We…