In Matter of Goldstein v Hynes (64 A.D.2d 1032, mot for lv to app den 45 N.Y.2d 712), petitioners sought to quash certain subpoenas ad testificandum issued to them, claiming, as do appellants herein, that the letters sent to the Attorney-General by the Commissioners of Health and Social Services do not confer upon the former power to initiate a broad investigation of the hospital industry.
Summary of this case from Landau v. HynesDecided September 19, 1978
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED
In Matter of Goldstein v Hynes (64 A.D.2d 1032, mot for lv to app den 45 N.Y.2d 712), petitioners sought to quash certain subpoenas ad testificandum issued to them, claiming, as do appellants herein, that the letters sent to the Attorney-General by the Commissioners of Health and Social Services do not confer upon the former power to initiate a broad investigation of the hospital industry.
Summary of this case from Landau v. HynesFull title:GOLDSTEIN, MATTER OF, v. HYNES
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Sep 19, 1978
Further, it should be noted that this is not the first time the Attorney-General's authority to investigate…