From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Goldsmith v. Terminal System, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 27, 1963
19 A.D.2d 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

June 27, 1963


Appeal by employer and carrier from an award of disability compensation. Appellants challenge the method used by the board in determining claimant's average weekly wage. Claimant was employed regularly on a full-time job as a delicatessen clerk. As a part-time job on every Sunday he drove a taxi. He sustained an injury in the latter employment. The board has computed his weekly wage pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 14 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law, and arrived at an average weekly wage of $69.26 with a weekly compensation rate of $46.17, which is higher than his actual weekly compensation as a taxi driver. This is clearly a case of dual and dissimilar employment, in fact it is conceded. Under the circumstances the board was justified in using the method authorized by subdivision 3 of section 14 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law. ( Matter of Stallone v. Liebmann Breweries, 12 A.D.2d 716, affd. 10 N.Y.2d 907; Matter of Ednie v. Five Star Beverage Co., 16 A.D.2d 845; Matter of Marlin v. Y N Cab Corp., 17 A.D.2d 876.) Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board. Bergan, P.J., Coon, Gibson and Taylor, JJ., concur; Herlihy, J.: I concur on the authority of Matter of Stallone v. Liebmann Breweries ( 10 N.Y.2d 907).


Summaries of

Matter of Goldsmith v. Terminal System, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 27, 1963
19 A.D.2d 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Matter of Goldsmith v. Terminal System, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JEROME GOLDSMITH, Respondent-Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Matter of Birtolo v. First Housing Co., Inc.

( Matter of Clippard v. Costello Concrete Co., 36 A.D.2d 786, affd. 30 N.Y.2d 628.) Appellants further…