From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Goldschmidt v. Hardy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1918
119 N.E. 1045 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued February 27, 1918

Decided March 19, 1918

Clarence U. Carruth, Charles R. Carruth and Charles J. Foltz for appellant.

William P. Burr, Corporation Counsel ( Terence Farley and Charles McIntyre of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, POUND and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Goldschmidt v. Hardy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1918
119 N.E. 1045 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Matter of Goldschmidt v. Hardy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of HERMANN E. GOLDSCHMIDT, Appellant, for…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 19, 1918

Citations

119 N.E. 1045 (N.Y. 1918)
119 N.E. 1045

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Vicary v. Thurston

The appointee is given authority to investigate only, and not to decide who should or should not receive…

Matter of Kilroe v. Craig

So far as our attention has been directed there is no controlling authority holding that any claim may be…