Opinion
May Term, 1902.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to right of respondent to renew.
The question presented on this appeal is precisely like the question presented on the appeal from the order fixing the compensation of Charles Frederick Hoffman, Jr., in Matter of Mayor ( ante, p. 113). The conclusion there reached necessitates a reversal of the order here appealed from and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case. The order appealed from, therefore, must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice, however, to the right of the respondent to renew his application if he be so advised, upon competent proof as to the value of the services rendered. Van Brunt, P.J., Ingraham and Hatch, JJ., concurred.