From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Goldin v. Goldin Decorating Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 27, 1928
161 N.E. 199 (N.Y. 1928)

Summary

In Goldin v. Goldin Decorating Co. and Royal Indemnity Co., 247 N.Y. 603, 161 N.E. 199, a case arising under the workmen's compensation law of New York, the claimant and two others organized a corporation to engage in the business of painting and decorating. He was elected vice president and treasurer. He was also employed by the corporation as "inside man" or "supervisor" at a stated salary.

Summary of this case from Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Hoage

Opinion

Argued February 14, 1928

Decided March 27, 1928

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Barnett Cohen, William E. Lyons and Frank J. O'Neill for appellant.

Albert Ottinger, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, ANDREWS, LEHMAN, KELLOGG and O'BRIEN, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Goldin v. Goldin Decorating Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 27, 1928
161 N.E. 199 (N.Y. 1928)

In Goldin v. Goldin Decorating Co. and Royal Indemnity Co., 247 N.Y. 603, 161 N.E. 199, a case arising under the workmen's compensation law of New York, the claimant and two others organized a corporation to engage in the business of painting and decorating. He was elected vice president and treasurer. He was also employed by the corporation as "inside man" or "supervisor" at a stated salary.

Summary of this case from Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Hoage
Case details for

Matter of Goldin v. Goldin Decorating Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JACK GOLDIN, Respondent, v. GOLDIN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 27, 1928

Citations

161 N.E. 199 (N.Y. 1928)
161 N.E. 199

Citing Cases

Staples v. Henderson Jersey Farms

In Loonsk v. Loonsk Bros. Cleaning Dyeing Works et al., 249 N.Y. 520, 164 N.E. 568, the Court of Appeals of…

Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Hoage

It may be added by way of analogy that it is not inconsistent for officers of corporations to serve at the…