Opinion
February 23, 1993
Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Leah Ruth Marks, J.).
Appellant's former wife brought a proceeding to enforce support obligations imposed under a judgment of divorce, and appellant cross-petitioned for downward modification. Contrary to appellant's contention, the hearing court properly weighed the comparative resources and equities of the two parents (see, Matter of Department of Welfare v "Mallory", 20 A.D.2d 884), and the present circumstances of appellant as opposed to his circumstances when the original obligation was imposed (see, Matter of Shipley v Shipley, 55 A.D.2d 577).
We have considered the remaining arguments, and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Ross, JJ.