Opinion
July 15, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellant has available to him a buy-out procedure which would provide him with a fair return on his investment. Therefore, dissolution would not be an appropriate remedy in this case (see, Matter of Brach, 135 A.D.2d 711; Matter of Harris, 118 A.D.2d 646). Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.