From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Godzisz v. Mohr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1993
197 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 1, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Lawton, Fallon, Boomer and Boehm, JJ. (Filed Aug. 20, 1993.)


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We agree with Supreme Court that the 1992 amendment to Election Law § 16-102 (2) (L 1992, ch 79, § 27) did not extend the time of petitioners to commence this proceeding. By its clear and unambiguous language, the amendment permits a proceeding to be commenced within three business days after the board "makes a determination of invalidity with respect to such petition". It does not apply to this proceeding brought to invalidate a petition that was not invalidated by the board.


Summaries of

Godzisz v. Mohr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1993
197 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Godzisz v. Mohr

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STEPHEN J. GODZISZ et al., Appellants, v. RALPH M. MOHR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 448

Citing Cases

Sirignano v. Sunderland

to petitions declared valid by the Board of Elections, there is a need for clarification from the Appellate…

In re Application of Sirignano v. Sunderland

First, Rapp is clearly inconsistent with the Court's own decisions inMatter of Eckart v. Edelstein, 185…