Opinion
June 17, 1952.
Present — Peck, P.J., Callahan, Van Voorhis, Heffernan and Bergan, JJ.
The record sufficiently establishes that the petitioner and respondents are parties to a contract containing an arbitration clause. Whether the contract was intended to apply to the new restaurant on Norfolk Street, is a question which should be determined by the arbitrators. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to petitioner-respondent.