From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Glaubach v. Wallach Wallach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 22, 1965
24 A.D.2d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

October 22, 1965


Appeal by the claimant-widow from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board which disallowed her claim for death benefits, finding that the presumption against suicide had been overcome by substantial evidence to the contrary and that decedent fell to his death from a balcony protected by a guardrail, stating that "deceased was 5' 4" tall and to a reasonable person it does not seem possible that deceased could have accidentally fallen to the ground". We cannot say as a matter of law that the board erred in its determination. Although there is a strong presumption against suicide, it is a question of fact for the board and we cannot substitute our opinion for that of the board when there is substantial evidence, as here, on which the board has based its determination. Appellant cites Hendry v. National Biscuit Co. ( 285 App. Div. 1104) in support of her position on appeal. However, in that case the board determined that the presumption was not overcome and we affirmed the factual question as determined by the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Glaubach v. Wallach Wallach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 22, 1965
24 A.D.2d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Matter of Glaubach v. Wallach Wallach

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ANNA GLAUBACH, Appellant, v. WALLACH WALLACH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 22, 1965

Citations

24 A.D.2d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Claim of MacKenzie v. Management Recruiters

er was not required to exclude all other possible nondeliberate, accidental explanations for this accident in…