From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gibson v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 7, 1995
218 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

August 7, 1995


Motion by the respondent to dismiss the proceeding and the application.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding and the application, and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motion, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding and application are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569; see, Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352). The petitioner here has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Gibson v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 7, 1995
218 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Gibson v. Goldstein

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BENNIE GIBSON, Petitioner, v. DAVID GOLDSTEIN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 7, 1995

Citations

218 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
630 N.Y.S.2d 931