From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Genesee Farms, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 1062 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 17, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, Jr., J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Determination unanimously annulled on the law with costs and petition granted. Memorandum: Respondent charged petitioner with unlawful sale of beer to a minor in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1). At the hearing, respondent called two witnesses, the minor and the police officer who stopped the minor after the sale. The minor testified that, in response to a request for identification from petitioner's clerk, he produced a Yates County Sheriff's identification card. The clerk asked if the minor had any other identification, and he responded that he did not. The minor further testified that he had used the card successfully on other occasions; some stores, however, would not accept a Sheriff's identification card as proof of age.

Based on the minor's testimony, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that petitioner had established the affirmative defense set forth in Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (4). He found that the sale was made in reasonable reliance on "a photographic identification card apparently issued by a governmental agency." Respondent rejected the ALJ's findings, sustained the charge against petitioner and imposed a 15-day suspension and a $1,000 bond forfeiture.

We conclude that the uncontroverted hearing testimony "established that petitioner's store clerk reasonably relied on the * * * identification in making the unlawful sale. It is inconsistent for respondent on the one hand to rely on that testimony to establish a violation and on the other hand to contend that, based on that same uncontroverted testimony, petitioner failed to establish the affirmative defense at issue" (Matter of Sonbyrne Sales v. New York State Liq. Auth., 192 A.D.2d 1118, 1119, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 655). We conclude, therefore, that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 181-182).


Summaries of

Genesee Farms, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 1062 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Genesee Farms, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GENESEE FARMS, INC., Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 1062 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 75