From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Geary v. Commr. of Motor Vehicles

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 950 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Decided June 30, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, VINCENT E. DOYLE, JR., J.

Robert J. Lane for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Patrick O. McCormack of counsel), for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice JOHN J. CALLAHAN at the Appellate Division ( 92 A.D.2d 38). We note, however, that no inference should be drawn that, had substantial prejudice resulted to petitioner from respondent's delay in scheduling the hearing, respondent would have been ousted of jurisdiction to revoke. In such circumstance, there would have been "at most an `erroneous exercise of authority' since such delay would not divest the [commissioner] of jurisdiction." ( Matter of Sarkisian Bros. v State Div. of Human Rights, 48 N.Y.2d 816, 818.)

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS.


Summaries of

Matter of Geary v. Commr. of Motor Vehicles

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 950 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Matter of Geary v. Commr. of Motor Vehicles

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH P. GEARY, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 30, 1983

Citations

59 N.Y.2d 950 (N.Y. 1983)
466 N.Y.S.2d 304
453 N.E.2d 533

Citing Cases

Syquia v. Board of Education

A rule that rendered every administrative decision void unless it was determined in strict literal compliance…

Lazich v. Perales

Having been commenced subsequent to an "indicated" finding, the sole remedy which the court can provide is to…