From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Garside v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 31, 1934
193 N.E. 341 (N.Y. 1934)

Opinion

Argued October 31, 1934

Decided October 31, 1934

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Watson Washburn, Maxwell Shapiro, Sanford H. Cohen, Whitney N. Seymour and Kenneth F. Simpson for appellants.

Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel ( Russell L. Tarbox of counsel), for Board of Elections, respondents. Benjamin J. Rabin, Irving H. Saypol, Samuel L. Scholer and Cornelius J. Smyth for Bernard Botein et al., respondents.


Order of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Special Term affirmed. Held, that the nominating petition was valid notwithstanding the irregularity in naming more than one committee to fill vacancies. No opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH and LOUGHRAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Garside v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 31, 1934
193 N.E. 341 (N.Y. 1934)
Case details for

Matter of Garside v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHARLES GARSIDE et al., Appellants, against S. HOWARD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 31, 1934

Citations

193 N.E. 341 (N.Y. 1934)
193 N.E. 341

Citing Cases

Matter of Sacks v. Power

In a proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law, to invalidate a petition designating Arthur J. Katzman…

Rosen v. Dodd

Matter of Collins v Meisser ( 22 N.Y.2d 779-780) succinctly stated the applicable rule as follows: "A…