From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Garguiolo v. N.Y. St. Thruway Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1988
145 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

December 23, 1988

Appeal from the Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Green and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: The Court of Claims, without stating reasons for its decision, granted claimants' application for permission to file a late notice of claim. We reverse. The statutory factors enunciated in Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) preclude granting the relief requested (Gatti v State of New York, 90 A.D.2d 840). Claimant provides no excuse for his six-month delay in filing a notice of claim. Further, there is no evidence that the State or the Thruway Authority had either notice of the essential facts constituting the claim or an opportunity to investigate the alleged accident. Additionally, the State would be prejudiced by this delay because of the changing nature of the construction site where claimant was injured. Claimant provides only bare factual allegations to support his potentially meritorious claim against the State for violating the provisions of the New York State Labor Law. Finally, claimant has a partial alternate remedy through workers' compensation.


Summaries of

Matter of Garguiolo v. N.Y. St. Thruway Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1988
145 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Garguiolo v. N.Y. St. Thruway Auth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RALPH GARGUIOLO et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK STATE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1988

Citations

145 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Schnier v. N.Y. State Thruway Auth.

Once the claimants' initial showing on the issue of substantial prejudice has been satisfied, a defendant…

Wetter v. State

On the other hand, since the incident was documented and the motion was commenced only three months after…