Opinion
May 16, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the arbitration award of the Beth Din, dated June 21, 1991, did not violate public policy (see, Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 N.Y.2d 623). We have reviewed the appellant's remaining contentions and find that they do not warrant vacatur of the arbitration award (see, Matter of Quentzel Plumbing Supply Co. v. Quentzel, 193 A.D.2d 678; Matter of Goltz [Ripps], 88 A.D.2d 1052). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, O'Brien and Joy, JJ., concur.