From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Garcia v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 2, 2000
270 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

March 2, 2000

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Robert Garcia, Malone, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter G. Crary of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: MERCURE, J.P., CREW III, CARPINELLO, GRAFFEO and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the possession of narcotics. The misbehavior report alleged that petitioner, while on drug watch, informed a correction officer that he needed to defecate and, subsequently, produced a balloon filled with a narcotic that was later tested and discovered to be heroin.

At the hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty "with an explanation" to the charge, made no procedural objections and stated that he did not want any witnesses. After the determination of guilt was affirmed upon administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination.

We confirm. By virtue of his knowing and voluntary guilty plea, petitioner is precluded from challenging the determination of his guilt on the ground of insufficient evidence (see, Matter of Miller v. Goord, 262 A.D.2d 906). Nonetheless, were we to consider this issue, we would find that petitioner's admission of guilt, the misbehavior report and the positive test results of the sample taken from petitioner were sufficient to constitute substantial evidence (see, Matter of Rossano v. Goord, 243 A.D.2d 773). Furthermore, inasmuch as petitioner failed to raise any objections to the sufficiency of the misbehavior report or to the chain of custody of the sample tested, he has failed to preserve these claims for our review (see, id.; see also, Matter of Stanislas v. Senkowski, 253 A.D.2d 972). We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments, including his claim of Hearing Officer bias, and find them to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Carpinello, Graffeo and Mugglin, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Garcia v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 2, 2000
270 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Garcia v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT GARCIA, Petitioner, v. GLENN GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 2, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 924

Citing Cases

Perez v. Selsky

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules…

Matter of Marks v. Goord

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from using…