Opinion
February 15, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the objectors substantially complied with the Board of Elections' rules regarding the filing of specifications of objections to designating petitions (see, Matter of Sullivan v. New York City Bd. of Elections, 224 A.D.2d 565 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Santucci, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.