Opinion
December 15, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition. The discretionary decisions of the Board of Parole to reinstate active supervision of the petitioner and defer the determination as to whether he should be discharged from parole were made in accordance with law, and therefore are not subject to judicial review ( see, Matter of Secilmic v. Keane, 225 A.D.2d 628; Matter of Ganci v. Hammock, 99 A.D.2d 546, 548).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
Rosenblatt, J. P., Altman, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.