From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gaines v. Bd. of Elections for Cty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1969
32 A.D.2d 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

June 9, 1969


In a proceeding to validate petitions designating petitioners herein as candidates in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for the Party position of County Committeeman for the 6th Election District of the 14th Assembly District of the County of Nassau, and for incidental relief, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 4, 1969, which denied the application and dismissed the petition in the proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, respondent Elovich had standing to object to the petitions for the reasons stated in Matter of Elovich v. Meisser ( 32 A.D.2d 795). However, the 11 valid signatures on the Gaines set of petitions cannot be added to the 26 valid signatures on the Gaines and Shapiro set of petitions because the petitions for Gaines are not consecutively numbered. Since 28 valid signatures were required to nominate a candidate for member of the Democratic County Committee from the 6th Election District of the 14th Assembly District, the petitions of neither candidate are valid.


In our opinion, Elovich had no standing to object to the designating petitions (see dissenting memorandum in Matter of Elovich v. Meisser, 32 A.D.2d 795).


Summaries of

Matter of Gaines v. Bd. of Elections for Cty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1969
32 A.D.2d 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Matter of Gaines v. Bd. of Elections for Cty

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RICHARD GAINES et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
303 N.Y.S.2d 336

Citing Cases

Matter of Turner v. Lawley

Special Term concluded that the single petitions and the multiple petitions should be considered as one…

Lucariello v. Niebel

We agree that, for this reason, the petitions were correctly dismissed as to all respondents except the two…