From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of G G Shops v. N.Y. City Loft Bd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 6, 1993
193 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 6, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Williams, J.).


The points raised by petitioner that were disposed of by the IAS Court are not objections that could have terminated the proceeding within the meaning of CPLR 7804 (g), and thus we review the matter de novo (see, 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac ¶ 7804.09). Upon such review, we find that respondent's treatment of two noncontiguous units as a single residence is supported by substantial evidence that neither was used simply for purposes of convenience (see, Briar Hill Apts. Co. v Teperman, 165 A.D.2d 519, 520-521), and that substantial evidence supports respondent's other factual determinations as well.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Ross, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of G G Shops v. N.Y. City Loft Bd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 6, 1993
193 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of G G Shops v. N.Y. City Loft Bd.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of G G SHOPS, INC., Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY LOFT BOARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 6, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
597 N.Y.S.2d 65

Citing Cases

W1-Bay Plaza v. Envtl. Control Bd.

med by the Appellate Division (Alexander, Practice Commentaries, CPLR 7804:8 [2016] ). An "objection as could…

Quire v. City of N.Y.

, in this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul respondents' February 16, 2018 determination finding…