From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Fullilove v. Carey

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1979
48 N.Y.2d 826 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Argued September 5, 1979

Decided November 20, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, ROGER J. MINER, J.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Shirley Adelson Siegel, Dominick J. Tuminaro, Arnold D. Fleischer and Judith T. Kramer of counsel), for Hugh L. Carey, as Governor of the State of New York, appellant.

Ann Thacher Anderson for Office of State Contract Compliance, Division of Human Rights, appellant.

Robert G. Benisch, Robert J. Fink and Richard O'Hara for respondents.

Victor M. Goode, Alton Maddox, Jr., and Howard Lane for National Conference of Black Lawyers and another, amici curiae. M.D. Taracido, Kenneth Kimerling, Peter Bienstock and Idelisse Malave for Puerto Rican Legal Defense Education Fund, Inc., amicus curiae.


Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice J. CLARENCE HERLIHY at the Appellate Division ( 62 A.D.2d 798; see, also, Matter of Fullilove v Beame, 48 N.Y.2d 376, decided herewith).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER. Judges FUCHSBERG and MEYER dissent and vote to reverse (see dissenting opn by FUCHSBERG, J., in Matter of Fullilove v Beame, 48 N.Y.2d 376, decided herewith).


Summaries of

Matter of Fullilove v. Carey

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1979
48 N.Y.2d 826 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

Matter of Fullilove v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of H. EARL FULLILOVE et al., as Trustees of the New York…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 20, 1979

Citations

48 N.Y.2d 826 (N.Y. 1979)
424 N.Y.S.2d 183
399 N.E.2d 1203

Citing Cases

Under 21 v. City of New York

Indeed, less than a year ago it was cited by our Court of Appeals to support the proposition that in our…

United Fence Guard Rail Corp. v. Cuomo

Whether the DBE program was properly authorized — whatever the posture of the case may have been at the time…