In Fuld v. Solomon Co. (197 App. Div. 911) the claimant was a buyer for a manufacturing establishment and was struck by a bicycle while passing along the street to reach a seller.
Summary of this case from Harby v. Marwell Brothers, Inc.May, 1921.
Award unanimously affirmed.
In Fuld v. Solomon Co. (197 App. Div. 911) the claimant was a buyer for a manufacturing establishment and was struck by a bicycle while passing along the street to reach a seller.
Summary of this case from Harby v. Marwell Brothers, Inc.Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: May 1, 1921
In Hospers v. Hungerford-Smith Co. ( 194 App. Div. 945; affd., 230 N.Y. 616) the claimant, a traveling…
Gibbs v. Macy Co., Inc.(§ 2, subd. 4.) It is familiar law that a plant worker in traveling to and from the plant is not in the…