From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Friends of Pine Bush v. Planning Bd. of City

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 9, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 849 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued May 4, 1983

Decided June 9, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, EDWARD S. CONWAY, J.

Vincent J. McArdle, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Condon A. Lyons of counsel), for appellants-respondents.

Lewis B. Oliver, Jr., for respondents-appellants.

Peter A. Lynch for intervenors-respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division did not err in retaining the appeal despite mootness or in converting the proceeding to an action for declaratory judgment. On the merits we affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion by Presiding Justice A. FRANKLIN MAHONEY at the Appellate Division ( 86 A.D.2d 246).

Concur: Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS. Taking no part: Chief Judge COOKE.


Summaries of

Matter of Friends of Pine Bush v. Planning Bd. of City

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 9, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 849 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Matter of Friends of Pine Bush v. Planning Bd. of City

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRIENDS OF THE PINE BUSH et al., Respondents-Appellants…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 9, 1983

Citations

59 N.Y.2d 849 (N.Y. 1983)
465 N.Y.S.2d 924
452 N.E.2d 1252

Citing Cases

Save Pine Bush v. Planning Bd.

This language contemplates adjustments in the bond once performance is underway. An "anticipatory adjustment"…

Peconic Baykeeper, Inc. v. Suffolk Cnty. Legislature

Further, the exception to the mootness doctrine is not applicable here. Although the potential environmental…