From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Friedman v. O'Connell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 11, 1958
5 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

March 11, 1958


The determination of the Commissioner of Licenses insofar as it finds petitioner guilty of the violation charged, is confirmed. However, considering the entire record, it may well be that the punishment imposed is excessive and an abuse of discretion (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1296, subd. 5-a). Petitioner, who has operated his business since 1952, has never heretofore been charged with any violation. The proceeding is remitted to the commissioner for a reconsideration of the order directing a suspension of petitioner's license for 10 days and, as so modified, the determination is unanimously confirmed, without costs. Settle order.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, Frank and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Friedman v. O'Connell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 11, 1958
5 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Matter of Friedman v. O'Connell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GEORGE FRIEDMAN, Doing Business under the Name of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1958

Citations

5 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Matter of Brennan v. Rubino

As so modified, determination confirmed, without costs. While a reasonable basis exists for the respondents'…