Opinion
Submitted November 4, 1999
December 6, 1999
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (McElligott, J.), entered January 8, 1999, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Crosson, H.E.), dated October 26, 1998, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition for a downward modification of child support.
Joseph Mauro, Huntington, N.Y., for appellant.
LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in admitting a decision of the Social Security Administration as some evidence, but not prima facie evidence, of the facts contained therein ( see, Cramer v. Kuhns, 213 A.D.2d 131, 136; Kaiser v. Metropolitan Tr. Auth., 170 Misc.2d 321, 326; cf., CPLR 4520).
BRACKEN, J.P., THOMPSON, FRIEDMANN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.