From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Foyt v. Daigler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 1932
236 App. Div. 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

September 23, 1932.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.

Robert J. Lansdowne, for the appellant Daigler.

Harry J. Kelly, for the appellant Phoenix Indemnity Company.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General [ Joseph A. McLaughlin, Assistant Attorney-General, and Roy Wiedersum of counsel], for the respondents.


The court approves of the findings herein except as to the wage rate under subdivision 5 of section 14 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law. In respect to this rate the conditions at the time of the injury control. Under the proof in this case the highest weekly wage upon which claimant's compensation could be computed is twenty-seven dollars.

The award should be reversed, and the claim remitted, with costs in one appeal against the State Industrial Board to abide the event. ( Matter of Kerchik v. LaFontaine Novelty Co., Inc., 225 App. Div. 437; Szmuda v. Kent Bag Co., 214 id. 341; Lerner v. Jakwall Embroidery Co., 203 id. 381.)

VAN KIRK, P.J., HINMAN, HILL, RHODES and CRAPSER, JJ., concur.

Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs in one appeal against the State Industrial Board to abide the event.


Summaries of

Claim of Foyt v. Daigler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 1932
236 App. Div. 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Claim of Foyt v. Daigler

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of NORMAN FOYT, Respondent, against WILLIAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 23, 1932

Citations

236 App. Div. 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
258 N.Y.S. 1020